Home Explore Library Help

Search the archive⌘K

A living room for X videos. Grab, watch, keep.

PRODUCT

Explore
Library
Settings

LEARN

Field notes
Help & FAQ

LEGAL

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Report content

© 2026 XDL · Built for the den

Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol today, literally · XDL

Home
Explore
Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol today, literally

Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol today, literally

@Mehul Mohan

1 grabs

Up next

TUNED TO THIS CLIP

Astra (GPT-6) is a full-stack developer that can finish coding work, then verify output, then mark linear tickets as done using your own hardware It's so over

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol scripting the same concept which one you like better? made with

I gave GPT 6 SOL and OPUS 5.5 the same prompt. It was not even close. Opus 5.5 is THE BEST model we have ever seen. links to game below.

Please welcome GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna to the GPT-6 universe. GPT-6 Sol and Luna build on the advances behind GPT-6 Astra, bringing much of its strengths into faster and more affordable models to support work at scale. We’ve also made caching and inference more efficient, and

Opus 5.5 just made GPT-6 Astra look like the most overpriced model in the room. Same tool. Same footage. Same prompt. Tesseract by Mirage ran both builds back to back, nothing else touched. Opus 5.5: $19.82. GPT-6 Astra: $161.54. Nobody could tell the two outputs apart without

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra

First Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra test is 3D. One prompt, Blender only, all procedural. Render the 10-second shot, and record your own build timelapse. Opus 5.5: 35 min, 199.6k output tokens, about $13.3 in API terms. GPT-6 Astra: 28 min, 56.6k output tokens, about $14.5 in API

This is GPT-6 Astra. Anything you can do on a computer, Astra can do for you. Fast.

No comments yet

Write a comment

Sign in with X to post

Say something. You’re first.