Home Explore Library Help

Search the archive⌘K

A living room for X videos. Grab, watch, keep.

PRODUCT

Explore
Library
Settings

LEARN

Field notes
Help & FAQ

LEGAL

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Report content

© 2026 XDL · Built for the den

Grok 4.7 vs Opus 5 · XDL

Home
Explore
Grok 4.7 vs Opus 5

Grok 4.7 vs Opus 5

@K2S

1 grabs

Up next

TUNED TO THIS CLIP

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Fable 5.1 vs GPT-Astra 6 Which one did better at Spider Man Game

Everyone says I need to touch grass - but I think Grok 4.7 does it best? I compared Grok 4.7 against Opus 5.5 on a grass-touching simulator in @kilocode. Grok's price: $3.52 Opus 5.5's Price: $7.35

@Brian Turcotte

Fable 5.1 + Opus 5

SWE-2 vs Grok 4.7

Made with @claudeai Opus 5.5

Grok 4.7 is worse than Grok 4.6. Not only is the output worse, but Slop 4.7 costs WAY more and is much slower than Grok 4.6. Slop 4.7 cost 3X as much as Grok 4.6 and took nearly 5X longer to complete the Sunset Ocean task in BridgeBench. What a dissapointment for Grok

Opus 5.5 生成介绍 Opus 5.5 短片，Opus 5.5 很赞

Grok 4.7 is a total disappointment. We ran it through BridgeBench's lava lamp test against Grok 4.6. Same prompt. Grok 4.6: $0.23, 9m 54s Grok 4.7: $0.35, 15m 46s 50% more expensive. 60% slower. And the output is still not usable for real frontend work. Grok had two

No comments yet

Write a comment

Sign in with X to post

Say something. You’re first.